Poker
Poker News

  Dear players, we inform you that starting from 1st January 2016 Offsidebet Poker will cease cooperation with the iPoker network. As a result of the discussions with the network, all funds from the customer accounts will be fully accessible for withdrawals. 

Until the final settlement with the iPoker network regarding the amounts available for the Offsidebet poker players and partners, there can be applied additional restrictions to some customer accounts in accordance with the closure rules specified below. The management of Offsidebet Poker guarantees equal treatment for all players and partners.

At the expiration of closure rules, but no later than 30.03.2016, the above restrictions will be removed, and the accounts of players and partners will be in standard mode.

We apologize for the restrictions and we assure you that the management of Offsidebet Poker will put all efforts to remove them before the mentioned deadline.
 
You can find more information about the closure rules of the Offsidebet Poker accounts from the iPoker network on this page: http://en.offsidebet.com/en-GB/t/poker/5-1  
 
 

 

Уважаемые игроки, извещаем Вас, что с 1 января 2016 года прекращается сотрудничество рума Offsidebet Poker с сетью iPoker. По результатам окончательного расчета с сетью все средства, находящиеся на игровых счетах клиентов, будут полностью доступны к выплатам. До момента окончательных расчетов с сетью iPoker к суммам, имеющимся в распоряжении игроков в покер и партнеров рума Offsidebet Poker, согласно условиям Правил закрытия счетов клиентов рума Offsidebet Poker в сети iPoker, к некоторым счетам клиентов Offsidebet могут применяться дополнительные ограничения, направленные на гарантированное администрацией рума Offsidebet Poker обеспечение равных прав клиентов и партнеров рума. По истечению действия сроков Правил закрытия счетов клиентов рума Offsidebet Poker в сети iPoker, но не позднее чем 30.03.2016 г., вышеупомянутые ограничения будут сняты, и дальнейшее обслуживание счетов игроков и партнеров будет проводиться в стандартном режиме.

Приносим свои искренние извинения за вводимый режим ограничений, и уверяем, что администрацией Offsidebet Poker будут приложены все усилия для того, чтобы данный режим был снят, по возможности, ранее указанных выше сроков.

Подробнее с содержанием и условиями Правил закрытия счетов клиентов рума Offsidebet Poker в сети iPoker вы можете ознакомиться на странице http://en.offsidebet.com/en-GB/t/poker/5-1

 NEW YORK (Legal Newsline) – A New York man is suing several banking, facilitating, payment processing, and online gambling companies over claims they illegally collect on debt.

Yehuda Guttman, individually and for all others similarly situated, filed a class action lawsuit Nov. 18 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Visa, MasterCard, American Express Credit Corp., J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Merrick Bank Corp., Capital One Bank, Paysafecard.com USA, Vantiv, FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging violations of New York General Obligation Law, unjust enrichment, fraud and misrepresentation, and negligence.
Guttman is one of thousands of people who have bet and lost money through FanDuel's and DraftKing's allegedly illegal sports gambling sites, the complaint states.
The suit states the banking defendants lent money or credit to Guttman for wagers he placed on the gambling sites. The facilitators (Visa, MasterCard, and American Express) received a fee from the banks for facilitating the money transfer, and the payment processors (Paysafecard.com and Vantiv) serve a "player banking function," receiving a fee as the financial intermediary between the gambling sites and their customers, according to the suit.
The banks have allegedly collected and continue to collect debts on the credit they lent for the purpose of wagering on the gambling sites. But the suit states New York law prohibits the enforcement or collection of debts issued for illegal gambling.
Guttman and others in the class seek restitution, statutory and punitive damages, an injunction permanently enjoining the defendants from engaging in the unlawful practices described, interests, and attorney fees and costs of the suit. Guttman and the putative class are represented by attorneys Hunter J. Shkolnik and Annie E. Causey of Napoli Shkolnik in New York City, and by attorney Brittany Weiner of Imbesi Law in New York City.
 

 UK newspaper The Evening Standard reports that FTSE 250 gambling software provider Playtech’s cash pile could make see more consolidation in the gambling industry’s services provision, even suggesting that it could make a £500 million acquisition bid for competitors OpenBet and Inspired Gaming.

The newspaper cites UBS Equity Research Director Tal Grant, who states that Playtech governance will be eager to close acquisitions in 2016 having failed to acquire financial trading platforms Plus500 and Ava Trade.
The UBS analysts further notes that Playtech has made little secret of its impending plans to boost up its sports betting services.
At the start of 2015, Playtech governance had outlined entry into the financial trading markets through strategic acquisitions.
However Playtech’s two major acquisitions of Plus500 (£450 million) and Ava Trade (£67 million) failed to materialise due to constant regulatory delays by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Central Bank of Ireland
Playtech are reported to be entering 2016 with £500 million cash excess on its balance sheet.
The technology provider which services platform provisions for tier 1 UK bookmakers Ladbrokes, Coral and William Hill may look to further its betting services by acquiring long time competitors OpenBet and Inspired Gaming as the betting industry further consolidates.
Whether such a move would clear the competition restrictions, given that Openbet itself is already a sizeable provider in the gaming space is unclear, although a move for Inspired is unlikley to cause any problems in that area.

 UK newspaper The Evening Standard reports that FTSE 250 gambling software provider Playtech’s cash pile could make see more consolidation in the gambling industry’s services provision, even suggesting that it could make a £500 million acquisition bid for competitors OpenBet and Inspired Gaming.

The newspaper cites UBS Equity Research Director Tal Grant, who states that Playtech governance will be eager to close acquisitions in 2016 having failed to acquire financial trading platforms Plus500 and Ava Trade.
The UBS analysts further notes that Playtech has made little secret of its impending plans to boost up its sports betting services.
At the start of 2015, Playtech governance had outlined entry into the financial trading markets through strategic acquisitions.
However Playtech’s two major acquisitions of Plus500 (£450 million) and Ava Trade (£67 million) failed to materialise due to constant regulatory delays by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Central Bank of Ireland
Playtech are reported to be entering 2016 with £500 million cash excess on its balance sheet.
The technology provider which services platform provisions for tier 1 UK bookmakers Ladbrokes, Coral and William Hill may look to further its betting services by acquiring long time competitors OpenBet and Inspired Gaming as the betting industry further consolidates.
Whether such a move would clear the competition restrictions, given that Openbet itself is already a sizeable provider in the gaming space is unclear, although a move for Inspired is unlikley to cause any problems in that area.
 

 The UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) national regulatory body has revealed the UK remote and non-remote gambling markets experienced year-on-year growth in terms of gross gaming yield (GGY) during the 12 months through to March 31, 2015.

The UK’s non-remote industry generated a GGY of £5.4 billion (€7.7 billion/$8.1 billion) in the 12 months, up 2% on the total posted in the corresponding period last year.
Non-remote betting was up from £3.17 billion to £3.25 billion, while GGY from casinos also increased from £1.1 billion to £1.2 billion.
However, the UKGC said arcades suffered a slight fall in GGY, with this dropping from £377.5 million to £371.7 million, while bingo also saw GGY fall from £672.4 million to £663.3 million.
In terms of remote betting, bingo and casino gambling, the UKGC noted these set of results were split in two due to the introduction of the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act from November 1, 2014.
Remote betting GGY for the period prior to the new Act totalled £753.5 million, while GGY for the period from November 1 to March 1 came in at £1.5 billion.
In the previous year, GGY for the UK remote betting, bingo and casino gambling sector amounted to £1.1 billion.
Elsewhere, the remote and non-remote activities surrounding the UK National Lottery totalled £3.2 billion, up from £3.1 billion last year, while remote and non-remote services for other lotteries grew from £306.8 million to £361.6 million.

 If there is a first rule of the Internet in Canada, it is “thou shall not block.”

Canadian Internet service providers face a wide range of policies that have implications for accessing content, including net neutrality rules and the copyright notice-and-notice system. Yet in virtually all cases, blocking or removing content is simply not done. (The lone exception is a limited, private sector led initiative to block child pornography images.)
Unlike other countries which have dabbled in mandated takedowns or Internet filtering, Canada has largely defended an “open Internet.”
Canadian law does not mandate that Internet providers take down content due to unproven allegations of copyright infringement or allow them to alter or change content. In fact, the Telecommunications Act stipulates that “a Canadian carrier shall not control the content or influence the meaning or purpose of telecommunications carried by it for the public.”
Despite the clear legal mandate to avoid blocking, earlier this month the Quebec government introduced unprecedented legislation that would require Internet providers to engage in content blocking. The new bill targets unlicensed online gambling websites as part of the government’s efforts to increase revenues from its own online gambling service, which has thus far failed to meet expectations.
The provisions are contained in an omnibus bill implementing elements of the government’s spring budget, which included a promise to establish website blocking requirements.
The bill provides that “an Internet service provider may not give access to an online gambling site whose operation is not authorized under Quebec law.” The government’s lottery commission will establish the list of banned websites.
According to the law, Internet providers are required to block access to the banned sites within 30 days. Failure to comply with the law could lead to initial fines of up to $100,000 with higher penalties for repeat offenders.
The Quebec initiative seems certain to end up before the courts. First, the Canadian constitution grants exclusive jurisdiction over telecommunications to the federal government. The Quebec government has unsuccessfully challenged the jurisdictional issue in the past.
While it will likely argue that the website blocking is a matter of consumer protection, which falls to the provinces (the rules will be placed in the Quebec consumer protection law), its stated purpose has little to do with protecting consumers.
When the measure was first announced in the budget, the government noted that its own site was not meeting revenue targets and that it believed that website blocking would generate millions in additional revenue. In fact, the government’s own working group on online gambling recommended a licensing system for all sites over blocking as the best means of protecting consumers.
If the jurisdictional issues fail to convince the courts, a free speech challenge surely will. There is little doubt that the government-mandated blocking represents a limit on the fundamental freedoms found in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
While those rights are not absolute, Quebec will face a difficult time arguing that the blocking is a reasonable limitation given the availability of alternatives that do not limit speech and might be more effective in protecting the public.
The no-blocking approach has served Canadians well, ensuring universal access to the content of their choice. As Quebec seeks to undo the first law of the Canadian Internet, it opens the door to expanded content blocking initiatives, perhaps targeting websites that do not meet language requirements or are alleged to contain infringing content.
If the bill becomes law, a legal challenge that brings together Internet providers, civil liberties groups and consumer advocates is a must.

 BOSTON -- Three full-fledged resort casinos have yet to open in Massachusetts, but some lawmakers are already poised to allow them to expand online.

Senate Minority Leader Bruce Tarr wants to authorize the state's Gaming Commission to grant licenses to existing casinos to offer online betting. Massachusetts would become the fourth state to do so.
Supporters say Tarr's proposal will help a fledgling casino industry capture a larger share of gambling dollars while drumming up even more tax revenue for cash-strapped state and local governments.
"We don't want them to be undermined by other states that allow it," said Tarr, R-Gloucester, sponsor of the bill.
The legislation doesn't allow new casino licenses, he said. Nor does it sanction casinos to offer a venue for fantasy sports -- an unregulated, multi-million dollar industry that is already attracting state scrutiny.
Massachusetts is expected have three regional resort casinos and a slots parlor up and running in the next several years, including a 24-story resort along the Everett waterfront operated by Las Vegas casino mogul Steve Wynn.
Penn National Gaming has spent $225 million to expand a harness racing track in Plainville into a slot parlor, which opened in June. MGM Resorts International is developing a $800 million resort casino in Springfield, which is set to open next year. And several casino operators are competing for a license in the South Shore region.
But casino operators are divided over web-based gambling, said Chris Moyer, a spokesman for the American Gaming Association.
Some casinos want to tap the online gaming market, he said, while others worry that it will keep customers from visiting their facilities and spending money on food, entertainment and other amenities.
"There's varying interest from the industry," he said. "There's some who view it was a way to attract more people, and others who see it as possibly decreasing the number of customers to land-based casinos."
Representatives for MGM, Penn and Wynn didn't respond to requests for comments.
A U.S. Justice Department ruling in 2011 gave states authority to offer Internet gambling to residents. Only three -- Nevada, Delaware and New Jersey -- have taken advantage of the ruling.
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, a 2016 Republican presidential candidate, approved online gambling in the Garden State two years ago as part of an effort to prop up Atlantic City's struggling casinos.
New Jersey officials are also seeking to legalize fantasy sports betting at casinos, but that proposal has been tied up in court challenges from college and professional sports franchises that oppose legalized wagering on their games.
Meanwhile, Congress has been debating a bill -- backed by some casino operators -- that forces those states to end their online gambling operations unless they accept federal sanctions.
For states that allow gambling - online or otherwise - big money is at stake.
Massachusetts will take 49 percent of gambling revenues from the slots parlor and 25 percent from the casinos once they open.
Overall casinos are expected to drum up more than $300 million a year in taxes -- money for education, local governments and other budget items, state officials say.
But the Bay State's casinos will enter a region already flush with well-established gambling facilities in Connecticut, Rhode Island, Maine and New York.
That has state officials concerned about a saturation of the regional market.
Plainridge Park Casino reported $12.9 million in revenue in October, down from $18 million in July. It expects to generate about $176 million in its first full year, roughly $24 million less than the state’s $200 million projection.
While online gambling has been heralded as a way to reinvigorate a sluggish casino industry and provide more state revenue, groups that work with compulsive gamblers say it could exacerbate existing social ills.
A recent study by the Cigna Foundation suggested that 7 1/2 percent of Massachusetts residents -- from 350,000 to 430,000 adults -- are considered "at-risk" gamblers. The study found adolescents are even more vulnerable.
"Our concern is that this would make gambling easier and more accessible," said Krystle Kelly, a spokeswoman for the Massachusetts Council on Compulsive Gambling. "Are we making it easier for people to fall deeper and deeper into trouble?"
 

 ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (AP) -- Internet gambling is slowly growing - but not expanding - after 2 1/2 years of online betting in the United States.

Online gambling revenue is increasing in at least two of the three states that currently offer it - New Jersey and Delaware. The third, Nevada, doesn't report Internet revenue separately.
But a hoped-for wave of expansion has not happened as many states sit on the sidelines and assess the costs and benefits of the nascent industry.
"Internet gambling revenue in Delaware, Nevada and New Jersey badly missed initial forecasts, which themselves were overly aggressive," said Chris Krafcik, research director for Gambling Compliance, which tracks gambling legislation nationwide.
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's administration, for example, had initially estimated Internet gambling would bring in $1 billion in its first year. It did about 12 percent of that.
"The negative P.R. that resulted, fair or not, really took the wind out of the expansionary sails," Krafcik said.
San Francisco-based Gambling Compliance predicts either California or Pennsylvania will approve Internet gambling next year, followed by New York and Mississippi in subsequent years. In 2016, the group projects, nine states will consider legalizing it, though not necessarily act to approve it.
The industry still faces some nagging issues, as well as looming threats - including an effort in Congress to ban Internet gambling nationwide. The Restoration of America's Wire Act has been introduced in both chambers this year, backed by billionaire casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, and could come up for a hearing next month.
New Jersey began offering Internet gambling on Nov. 25, 2013, and took in $122 million in its first full year. Over the first 10 months of this year, the Atlantic City casinos have already equaled that total, with their Internet gambling revenue up 17.6 percent from the same period last year.
Delaware won $1.4 million in fiscal year 2014; $1.8 million in 2015, and $500,000 so far this fiscal year, which runs from July through June.
Nevada stopped reporting Internet gambling revenue as a separate item at the end of 2014. Online poker, the only brand of online gambling Nevada offers, is just a drop in the bucket of the state's $11 billion gambling market.
Online poker is the most popular form of Internet gambling, although the small number of states offering it has kept prize pools low. New Jersey has sought to partner with other states that might legalize it to offer larger, joint prize pools.
PokerStars, the world's largest Internet poker site, will begin operating in New Jersey in the first half of 2016, and many industry executives expect it to grow the market, though how much remains to be seen. In March, Morgan Stanley cut its estimate of the potential U.S. Internet gambling market by nearly half, pegging it at $2.7 billion by 2020, down from an initial estimate of $5 billion.
At first, one of the main impediments to people getting online to gamble was funding their accounts. Many credit cards wary of running afoul of a law banning banks from funding illegal Internet bets were reluctant to process transactions, but that has changed. New Jersey says MasterCard is approving 70 percent of attempted Internet gambling transactions in the state, while Visa is at 62 percent. PayPal also recently agreed to participate.
From a legal and consumer protection standpoint, Internet gambling has proven to be reliable and transparent, said David Rebuck, New Jersey's top gambling regulator. Technology to ensure a player is actually within the state's borders have reduced false rejections - initially a problem - to a negligible issue. And it's keeping most outsiders from gambling illegally: only two people were found to have successfully placed bets from outside New Jersey since 2013, Rebuck said. Officials confiscated the money in their accounts, totaling about $1,000.
In New Jersey, Internet gambling was seen as a lifeline to Atlantic City's struggling casinos. Less than a year after it began, four of its 12 casinos went out of business. But for those that remain, Internet gambling often makes the difference between an up or a down month.
"The market was smaller than a lot of people predicted, but the market is growing pretty nicely now," said Tom Ballance, president of the Borgata, Atlantic City's top casino and its leading online winner.
Internet gambling has generated $6 million in earnings for the Borgata over the first three quarters of this year, Ballance said.
"In Atlantic City, $6 million in profit is not easy to come by," he said. "We'll take that anytime."
 

 ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (AP) -- Internet gambling is slowly growing - but not expanding - after 2 1/2 years of online betting in the United States.

Online gambling revenue is increasing in at least two of the three states that currently offer it - New Jersey and Delaware. The third, Nevada, doesn't report Internet revenue separately.
But a hoped-for wave of expansion has not happened as many states sit on the sidelines and assess the costs and benefits of the nascent industry.
"Internet gambling revenue in Delaware, Nevada and New Jersey badly missed initial forecasts, which themselves were overly aggressive," said Chris Krafcik, research director for Gambling Compliance, which tracks gambling legislation nationwide.
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's administration, for example, had initially estimated Internet gambling would bring in $1 billion in its first year. It did about 12 percent of that.
"The negative P.R. that resulted, fair or not, really took the wind out of the expansionary sails," Krafcik said.
San Francisco-based Gambling Compliance predicts either California or Pennsylvania will approve Internet gambling next year, followed by New York and Mississippi in subsequent years. In 2016, the group projects, nine states will consider legalizing it, though not necessarily act to approve it.
The industry still faces some nagging issues, as well as looming threats - including an effort in Congress to ban Internet gambling nationwide. The Restoration of America's Wire Act has been introduced in both chambers this year, backed by billionaire casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, and could come up for a hearing next month.
New Jersey began offering Internet gambling on Nov. 25, 2013, and took in $122 million in its first full year. Over the first 10 months of this year, the Atlantic City casinos have already equaled that total, with their Internet gambling revenue up 17.6 percent from the same period last year.
Delaware won $1.4 million in fiscal year 2014; $1.8 million in 2015, and $500,000 so far this fiscal year, which runs from July through June.
Nevada stopped reporting Internet gambling revenue as a separate item at the end of 2014. Online poker, the only brand of online gambling Nevada offers, is just a drop in the bucket of the state's $11 billion gambling market.
Online poker is the most popular form of Internet gambling, although the small number of states offering it has kept prize pools low. New Jersey has sought to partner with other states that might legalize it to offer larger, joint prize pools.
PokerStars, the world's largest Internet poker site, will begin operating in New Jersey in the first half of 2016, and many industry executives expect it to grow the market, though how much remains to be seen. In March, Morgan Stanley cut its estimate of the potential U.S. Internet gambling market by nearly half, pegging it at $2.7 billion by 2020, down from an initial estimate of $5 billion.
At first, one of the main impediments to people getting online to gamble was funding their accounts. Many credit cards wary of running afoul of a law banning banks from funding illegal Internet bets were reluctant to process transactions, but that has changed. New Jersey says MasterCard is approving 70 percent of attempted Internet gambling transactions in the state, while Visa is at 62 percent. PayPal also recently agreed to participate.
From a legal and consumer protection standpoint, Internet gambling has proven to be reliable and transparent, said David Rebuck, New Jersey's top gambling regulator. Technology to ensure a player is actually within the state's borders have reduced false rejections - initially a problem - to a negligible issue. And it's keeping most outsiders from gambling illegally: only two people were found to have successfully placed bets from outside New Jersey since 2013, Rebuck said. Officials confiscated the money in their accounts, totaling about $1,000.
In New Jersey, Internet gambling was seen as a lifeline to Atlantic City's struggling casinos. Less than a year after it began, four of its 12 casinos went out of business. But for those that remain, Internet gambling often makes the difference between an up or a down month.
"The market was smaller than a lot of people predicted, but the market is growing pretty nicely now," said Tom Ballance, president of the Borgata, Atlantic City's top casino and its leading online winner.
Internet gambling has generated $6 million in earnings for the Borgata over the first three quarters of this year, Ballance said.
"In Atlantic City, $6 million in profit is not easy to come by," he said. "We'll take that anytime."
 

 ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (AP) -- Internet gambling is slowly growing - but not expanding - after 2 1/2 years of online betting in the United States.

Online gambling revenue is increasing in at least two of the three states that currently offer it - New Jersey and Delaware. The third, Nevada, doesn't report Internet revenue separately.
But a hoped-for wave of expansion has not happened as many states sit on the sidelines and assess the costs and benefits of the nascent industry.
"Internet gambling revenue in Delaware, Nevada and New Jersey badly missed initial forecasts, which themselves were overly aggressive," said Chris Krafcik, research director for Gambling Compliance, which tracks gambling legislation nationwide.
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's administration, for example, had initially estimated Internet gambling would bring in $1 billion in its first year. It did about 12 percent of that.
"The negative P.R. that resulted, fair or not, really took the wind out of the expansionary sails," Krafcik said.
San Francisco-based Gambling Compliance predicts either California or Pennsylvania will approve Internet gambling next year, followed by New York and Mississippi in subsequent years. In 2016, the group projects, nine states will consider legalizing it, though not necessarily act to approve it.
The industry still faces some nagging issues, as well as looming threats - including an effort in Congress to ban Internet gambling nationwide. The Restoration of America's Wire Act has been introduced in both chambers this year, backed by billionaire casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, and could come up for a hearing next month.
New Jersey began offering Internet gambling on Nov. 25, 2013, and took in $122 million in its first full year. Over the first 10 months of this year, the Atlantic City casinos have already equaled that total, with their Internet gambling revenue up 17.6 percent from the same period last year.
Delaware won $1.4 million in fiscal year 2014; $1.8 million in 2015, and $500,000 so far this fiscal year, which runs from July through June.
Nevada stopped reporting Internet gambling revenue as a separate item at the end of 2014. Online poker, the only brand of online gambling Nevada offers, is just a drop in the bucket of the state's $11 billion gambling market.
Online poker is the most popular form of Internet gambling, although the small number of states offering it has kept prize pools low. New Jersey has sought to partner with other states that might legalize it to offer larger, joint prize pools.
PokerStars, the world's largest Internet poker site, will begin operating in New Jersey in the first half of 2016, and many industry executives expect it to grow the market, though how much remains to be seen. In March, Morgan Stanley cut its estimate of the potential U.S. Internet gambling market by nearly half, pegging it at $2.7 billion by 2020, down from an initial estimate of $5 billion.
At first, one of the main impediments to people getting online to gamble was funding their accounts. Many credit cards wary of running afoul of a law banning banks from funding illegal Internet bets were reluctant to process transactions, but that has changed. New Jersey says MasterCard is approving 70 percent of attempted Internet gambling transactions in the state, while Visa is at 62 percent. PayPal also recently agreed to participate.
From a legal and consumer protection standpoint, Internet gambling has proven to be reliable and transparent, said David Rebuck, New Jersey's top gambling regulator. Technology to ensure a player is actually within the state's borders have reduced false rejections - initially a problem - to a negligible issue. And it's keeping most outsiders from gambling illegally: only two people were found to have successfully placed bets from outside New Jersey since 2013, Rebuck said. Officials confiscated the money in their accounts, totaling about $1,000.
In New Jersey, Internet gambling was seen as a lifeline to Atlantic City's struggling casinos. Less than a year after it began, four of its 12 casinos went out of business. But for those that remain, Internet gambling often makes the difference between an up or a down month.
"The market was smaller than a lot of people predicted, but the market is growing pretty nicely now," said Tom Ballance, president of the Borgata, Atlantic City's top casino and its leading online winner.
Internet gambling has generated $6 million in earnings for the Borgata over the first three quarters of this year, Ballance said.
"In Atlantic City, $6 million in profit is not easy to come by," he said. "We'll take that anytime."
 
pages: 1 2 3 ... 80 >>
  • 1669

  • 1816
  • 1537

  • 1543

  • 1549

  • 1546

  • Getting Started Poker in 4 steps

    Step 1 Step 2
    Step 3 Step 4