Poker
Poker News

 Thirteen-time WSOP bracelet winner Phil Hellmuth played on an episode of “Poker Night in America” yesterday that featured him wearing an outfit that might be more himself than some of his other costumes in the past.

During play, Hellmuth, known widely as “the Poker Brat”, was dressed as a baby. He had on a onesie and a bonnet and was holding a bottle and rattle.
It’s unclear at this moment if he cried or got any baby formula on the felt.
The game, which also featured well-known poker pros Layne Flack and Tom Schneider, was held at Maryland Live! Casino.
Poker Night in America airs Sundays on CBS Sports Network, but also has a live streaming presence on its website, PokerNight.com.
The show gained a lot of attention last year after an epic slowroll by Shaun Deeb. Deeb held quads and took his time calling Mike Matusow’s all-in bet. Matusow nearly exploded.

 On Monday, US Senators Kelly Ayotte (R-NH), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Linsey Graham (R-SC) submitted a letter to United States Attorney General Eric Holder asking him to support S-2159, the federal bill intended to strengthen the Wire Act.

The Poker Players Alliance published a copy of the letter online and it opened claiming that the December 2011 DOJ decision reversed “50 years of interpretation of the Wire Act,” claiming that it only applied to sports betting. They then claimed that decision left on its own could usher in “the most fundamental change in gambling in our lifetimes by turning every smart phone, tablet, and personal computer in our country into a casino available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.”
The Senators also point to FBI claims that online gambling and poker could open the door to potential money laundering and other criminal activity. They also pointed to the potential dangers to children and society’s most vulnerable.
The letter then went on to solicit the support of Holder and his office despite the fact that it was the DOJ’s Wire Act memo that opened the door to the legal US online poker market.
They closed the letter claiming that action is needed before “we find virtual casinos making gambling pervasive in our society, invading living rooms, bedrooms, and dorm rooms across the country; a result we know the DOJ does not want to see.”
One interesting tidbit that came from the letter is a statement that they expect the Senate to act on S-2159 by the end of the year. If this is true, it would be a huge move considering that bills regarding any form of online gambling have failed to gain any traction in recent years.
The Restoration of America’s Wire Act would effectively make most forms of online gambling and online poker illegal in the United States. A further consequence of the bill is that it would also undo the legalized markets currently in place in New Jersey, Nevada and Delaware.
It would seem unlikely that Holder would come out in support of this bill, as doing so would seemingly undermine the DOJ’s memo from 2011. However, one has to give credit to the Senators for covering all potential avenues in garnering support for the bill.

 As was widely expected, shareholders of the Amaya Gaming Group Inc yesterday voted in favour of the $4.9 billion deal to take over PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker

In an extra-ordinary general meeting held yesterday at Amaya´s headquarters in Pointe-Claire, Quebec, all the resolutions related to the company´s proposed acquisition of Oldford Group Ltd (the parent company of the Rational Group – who own PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker) were approved by the company´s shareholders.
Key to the success of the deal´s completion was a resolution creating a new class of convertible preferred shares and warrants that will be transferred to the institution funding the deal – GSO Capital Partners. This resolution was passed unanimously, and the company (who also changed its name to Amaya Inc during the EGM) will now be able to move towards completing the takeover.
It´s Been a Good Week for Amaya
The rubber-stamping of Amaya´s proposed takeover of PokerStars comes at the end of a good week for the company. Last Thursday the French regulatory authority ARJEL approved the switch of ownership – stating that a change of indirect control does not change PokerStars´ technical, economic and financial capacity to carry out its activity – and the Toronto Stock Exchange gave a conditional green light for Amaya to issue the preferred shares and warrants to finance the transaction.
It has also personally been a good week for Amaya´s CEO David Baazov, who made a good impression at the Global iGaming Summit and Expo (GIGse) in San Francisco when discussing time-based entertainment value – an indication that Amaya intends to focus on recreational players – and he was also warmly welcomed by members of the 2+2 poker community when he created an account to join the discussion about Amaya´s acquisition of PokerStars.
Baazov Admits Hard Work Lies Ahead
Following the conclusion of the EGM, a press release was issued by Amaya Inc in which Baazov extended his appreciation to the company´s shareholders for their overwhelming support of the acquisition of the Rational Group; however, in a brief interview after the meeting he admitted that the hard work lies ahead – As hard as you feel you’ve worked historically in M&A (mergers and acquisitions) and until you get the transaction done, the hard part always comes after it’s done.
In many observers´ eyes Baazov was referring to the approval required by regulators to the change of PokerStars´ ownership. In addition to the French operating licence, Amaya´s acquisition of PokerStars will have to be approved by regulators in Spain, Italy, France, Denmark, Belgium, Bulgaria and Estonia; there is a deadline of the 16th September for Amaya´s licence application in the UK and ongoing talks with New Jersey´s Division of Gaming Enforcement in addition to Baazov actively lobbying to be involved in California´s proposed legislation.
Amaya Stocks on a High after Shareholder Vote
The news of Amaya Inc getting clearance to complete the acquisition of the Rational Group was pre-empted by a surge in the company´s share price – which traded at over CAD$30.00 before closing at CAD$29.61 – an increase of 330% over twelve months ago. Analysts believe that the price of Amaya´s openly traded shares could reached as high as CAD$35.00 following the shareholders vote – a clear sign that the money markets have confidence in the future of PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker.
 

 Regulations governing online slots and exchange betting in Spain have been approved by the national government.

In a statement on the website of the DGOJ, the Directorate General for the Regulation of Gambling in Spain, the Ministry of Finance and Government said that the regulations had been adopted by the publication of ministerial orders.
Following the end of the public and operator consultancy period on March 27, the DGOJ received numerous suggestions and observations on the slots and exchange betting regulations, with those that could add value to the regulation given consideration.
The Ministry said that the publication of the orders had been completed after a process to “enrich and refine” their content. The regulations are now “conducive to the regulated development of these games,” the Ministry added.
“With the adoption of these regulations the online gaming market will be strengthened,” the Ministry continued.
“As a consequence of this (the regulations) will make a positive impact regarding the protection of particularly vulnerable groups, the fight against fraud, generating tax income, and ultimately the creation of an environment in which users can engage in this activity in a safe, responsible manner.”
It is estimated that it will take six months following the publication of the new ministerial orders for the slots and exchange betting to “go live”.
 

 Gaming entertainment products and services supplier Williams Interactive has launched its white label Play4Fun Network iGaming and marketing platform with Parx Casino, the largest casino operation in Pennsylvania, US.

Parx Casino is hoping that the network, a B2B premium free-play online gaming platform, will help it to build an online community, with players able to access the casino content online and via mobile devices.
The platform will offer a range of games, including WMS Gaming slots Super Jackpot Party, Kronos and Black Knight.
“Following a diligent review process of available options in the space, we've found the Williams Interactive Play4Fun Network to be the best solution for providing exciting casino entertainment experiences to our players when they spend their time away from our casino – at home and on-the-go,” Parx Casino chief technology officer John Dixon said.
“The launch of our platform is an exciting step for Parx Casino, and we look forward to continue building an engaged online player community in the near term, while positioning our operation for any potential future legalisation of iGaming.”
Williams Interactive managing director Jordan Levin added: “Partnering with a client of the scale and reputation of Parx Casino is an exciting leap forward for our B2B social casino business.
“With the Play4Fun Network platform, we anticipate that Parx Casino will be able to leverage our proven free-play casino content to increase the value of their brand with players online to drive incremental visits to their casino floor.
“Through this platform, Parx Casino will better maximise the benefits to their casino from the ongoing convergence of online and offline gaming experiences.”

 The Nevada Gaming Commission (NGC) approved a plan late last week that would enable Nevada online poker operators to combine player pools.

Applications by Caesars Interactive Entertainment (CIE)—operator of WSOP.com—and Treasure Island were recommended for approval by the Nevada Gaming Control Board earlier this month.
Under the plan, the player pool at WSOP.com Nevada could be combined with Treasure Island when they eventually go live.
WSOP.com currently utilizes the 888poker software and Treasure Island has an agreement in place to use the 888 software.
Treasure Island was designated to become the first skin on 888’s All American Poker Network (AAPN).
888poker also provides the online poker software used in the regulated state of Delaware, where three licensed racinos share player pools.
Earlier this year Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval and Delaware Governor Jack Markell signed an agreement to allow for the sharing of player pools between internet gambling operators in both states.
The deal between Nevada and Delaware allows other states that approve online gaming and meet a minimum regulatory threshold to join in the sharing of player liquidity.
The approval granted by the NGC was the final regulatory step needed to make shared player liquidity in Nevada possible; however, it will not become a reality until Treasure Island or 888 itself launches online poker in the state.

 On a Saturday afternoon with some free time on my hands, I decided to see if I could get some answers from Lock Poker regarding the almost $1 million owed to players.

As most are aware, 2 + 2 poster 'IHasTehNutz' has dutifully compiled a list of 392 players who are owed $978,228.69 from Lock, with most having waited over a year for their money. The delay in payment prompted the Poker Players Alliance to get involved some three months ago by sending a letter to Lock representatives in hopes of establishing a dialogue and getting player funds returned.
Lock has apparently remained mum on the PPA request, not at all surprising to the players who have been trying for months to get truthful answers from Lock by various means. Answers have come in the form of promises of payment, yet the almost 400 players waiting for funds can attest to the fact that the promises have come up empty.
Although I have no money on Lock, (mine is tied up at Absolute Poker) I hoped to get some answers for those that do and felt the best way would be as a prospective depositor. Of course, I have no plans to actually make a deposit at Lock, as getting burned by AP is quite enough for me.
Anyway, I managed to get through to 'Mary' at Lock customer support and informed her that I would like to deposit. I expressed concern that payment may be slow according to what I had heard and was told that "cashouts are processed within 8-10 weeks."
I then stated that I was aware that some players had been subjected to a year-long wait on their withdrawal requests, to which Mary informed me that "our main focus at present is withdrawals and you will notice changes for the better in the upcoming weeks." I attempted to confirm that payment will be forthcoming for those waiting and was told that, "yes all withdrawals will be honored."
Mary then abruptly chose to end our conversation before I could make further inquiries regarding matters such as the unanswered letter sent by the PPA. The promises that I received from Mary are apparently the same sort that countless others who have inquired as of late have heard. A sampling from 2 + 2 poster 'bales' from a few days ago:
I had a chat recently with dear old 'Mary',whoever the f she is, anyway, she fed me a new line of BS when I asked 'when will I get my money?' Her response was 'you are near the end of the 2nd of 3 stages'...wow that's the first reference anyone (Shane, Mary, etc.) has made about any stage shet in the last 11 months that I've now been waiting."
The promises of payment continue, with various plans of action mentioned, yet players owed nearly $1 million continue to wait for funds that many have written off as a lost cause. Meanwhile, it's apparently business as usual at Lock where the site home page continues promoting the benefits of playing there.
Ironically enough, one of the features promoted at Lock is a "Vault" where players will find added protection for their funds. Per the Lock website:
Keep your bankroll safe and secure in your Vault. Protected with an additional PIN and security question, the Vault adds an additional layer of security to protect your money."
Considering the documented amount of money owed to players and the time that has elapsed without payment, this Lock feature is laughable. But it is certainly not funny to the players who are waiting for funds.
It is obvious that the only individuals who have access to the Lock vault are the owners who continue to make promises of payment that go unfulfilled. It is important to stress that any new players who are considering depositing on Lock must be made aware that it is a terrible idea to do so at this time. Just ask almost 400 players who haven't been paid.

 MANILA, Philippines - A partylist legislator has proposed a measure that would regulate online gambling as it has become accessible to minors.

ACT- CIS partylist Rep. Samuel Pagdilao said House Bill 4540 seeks to monitor Internet gambling and protect minors from the pernicious effects of gambling.
The introduction of the Internet has had a great impact on the ways people could participate in gambling, according to Pagdilao.
“People are no longer bound to physical locations and are able to face their bets from within their own homes,” Pagdilao said.
The bill also provides the penalty of imprisonment from five years to 10 years or a fine ranging from P5 million to P10 million or both shall be imposed upon any licensee or employee of an online gaming firm who allows a person under 18 years of age to open, maintain or use an Internet gaming account.
Under the measure, a licensee refers to the duly licensed holder of an Internet Gaming Certificate authorized by the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (board) to conduct Internet gaming.
Nation ( Article MRec ), pagematch: 1, sectionmatch: 1
Internet gaming, on the other hand, is defined as the placing of bets or wagers with licensee located in this jurisdiction using a computer network through which a licensee may offer authorized Internet games to individuals who have registered and established an Internet gaming account with the licensee.
A penalty of imprisonment from 5 years to 10 years or a fine of P100,000 or both shall be imposed upon any parent, guardian who induces minors to commit any of the offenses punishable under the proposed Act.

 Online poker revenue cracked the $1 million mark for the first time since the results have been publicly reported.

Wagering on World Cup soccer accounted for the state’s highest-ever month in the “other sports” category of sports wagering, which included a 116.3 percent in increase in revenue.
Still, Wall Street remained somewhat reserved after the Gaming Control Board on Friday released figures showing the state and Strip recorded their highest monthly revenue increases in 2014.
“We expect investors to be satisfied, but not ecstatic,” said Macquarie Securities gaming analyst Chad Beynon.
Statewide, casinos collected $906.9 million from gamblers, a 14.4 percent increase compared to a year ago.
Strip casinos collected almost $532.4 million, an increase of almost 22.5 percent.
The Strip totals were helped by baccarat, which had the highest revenue and wagering totals for June.
The game contributed $132.8 million in revenue to casinos, a 155 percent increase over June 2013. Gamblers wagered $1.086 billion on baccarat, 57 percent more than a year ago. The hold percentage — what casinos held based on the wagers — was 12.4 percent, compared to 7.6 percent last year.
Strip casinos also played lucky on slot machine wagering. Casinos collected $241 million in revenue from slots, an increase of 9 percent from a year ago. The increase was the largest jump in more than a year and halted two straight months of declines in slot machine revenue.
Customers wagered almost $3.2 billion on slot machines during, an increase of 4 percent
Wells Fargo Securities gaming analyst Cameron McKnight said Strip revenues were up 8 percent when removing the effect of baccarat.
Still, McKnight said he viewed the results as a positive for Wynn Resorts Ltd., Las Vegas Sands Corp., and MGM Resorts International.
Analysts said the Strip’s baccarat numbers have impressed investors for the past three months.
Union Gaming Group analyst Robert Shore said there may be a correlation between strength in Las Vegas and recent weak baccarat numbers out of Macau.
“Recent commentary and channels checks indicate Las Vegas Strip properties are seeing an increase in Chinese visitors,” Shore said. “This meshes with our thesis that the primary driver of VIP softness in Macau is politics, not the economy.”
For the first six months of 2014, gaming revenue is up 1.5 percent statewide and 3.4 percent on the Strip, which also experienced a 17.3 percent gaming revenue increase in May.
Gaming Control Board Senior Research Analyst Mike Lawton said gaming revenue from Strip casinos was down 5.5 percent for the first three months of 2014 but has increased 14.4 percent over the last three months.
Shore said the Strip’s revenue since the beginning of the year came from nongaming segments, such as nightlife, restaurants, and the hotel rooms.
“The growth in the gaming segment is an added catalyst to the Las Vegas Strip recovery,” Shore said.
The World Cup soccer tournament from Brazil was the primary driver for $5.9 million in revenue in the “other sports” category of sports wagering. The amount wagered in the category — which includes hockey, auto racing and boxing — was $53.4 million, an increase of 184.3 percent from a year ago.
“We see the bump every four years,” Lawton said in reference to World Cup soccer.
During June, Nevada’s three online poker websites — Ultimate Poker, WSOP.com and Real Gaming — collected a combined $1.037 million in gaming revenue. Nevada’s first poker website began operating 15 months ago. Analysts said the figure was helped by activity associated with the World Series of Poker, which took place at the Rio during the month.
Shore said the state’s online poker results will continue to be soft until Nevada’s agreement share players with Delaware takes affect.
“In the future, multi-state poker compacts could be a more impactful revenue event given a larger base of players, and due to the liquidity dynamic,” Shore said.
Clark County as whole experienced a combined gaming revenue increase 17 percent. North Las Vegas casinos recorded a 22.7 percent increase in June while casinos along the Boulder Strip saw gaming revenue increase 17 percent.
Downtown casinos saw gaming revenue jump almost 12 percent in June, which helped reverse an 8 percent decline in May.
Northern Nevada markets weren’t as lucky in June.
Gaming revenue in Washoe County as a whole was down almost 3 percent and Reno casinos saw a 3.1 percent decrease. North Lake Tahoe casinos experienced a 15.4 percent decline.
Nevada collected almost $43.6 million in gaming taxes during July based on June’s gaming revenue total, an increase of less than 1 percent compared to a year ago.
Gaming regulators also released the state’s fiscal year 2014 gaming revenue totals.
Statewide, Nevada casinos collected $11.2 billion between July 2013 and June 2014, an increase of 2.9 percent over the previous fiscal year. Strip casinos collected $6.6 billion, an increase of 5.2 percent.
Lawton said Strip casino revenues represented 58.9 percent of the state’s total for the fiscal year. Baccarat revenues accounted for 25.5 percent of the Strip’s overall total, an all-time high.
Statewide, revenue from slot machines of $6.7 billion represented 60 percent of the state’s overall total, the lowest percentage for the game since fiscal year 1991.

 On Tuesday Canadian customers of Matchbook.com received a letter from the company telling them that the Matchbook will no longer be catering to the Canadian market. The news has many Canadian bettors wondering what exactly is happening and which online gambling companies will be next to leave the market. Last year Skrill/Moneybookers stopped processing gambling payments for Canadians and this year several sportsbooks including Bet365 stopped their advertising and sponsorships in Canada. For a few years Bet365 via their .net site was not only advertising frequently but they also sponsored a Sunday NFL radio show in Toronto and were the official sponsors of the Canadian Football League. The question that many are asking is what is precipitating these moves? There is much speculation but Matchbook refused to respond to my emails other than to say it was a management decision and Skrill provided a similar response when they withdrew. It is fairly obvious that the increasing hassle of dealing with Canadian banks for such a small percentage of their clientele and the desire to operate in New Jersey was the main reason that Skrill decided to abandon the Canadian grey market.

I spoke to Michael D. Lipton, a Canadian gaming lawyer and industry expert and asked him why he suspects companies are withdrawing from Canada. Lipton indicated he did know the reason for the withdrawal by Skrill and Matchbook but wasn't at liberty to give specifics. He did state however say that whenever he receives an inquiry from any gambling operator that wants to cater to the Canadian market, he informs them that the Canadian laws are very specific and they need to consider risk/reward before they take the plunge.
"The law is clear in Canada," Lipton said, "only provincial governments can run online gambling. If these offshore operators tried to set up a physical location in Canada and offer their products to Canadian citizens they would almost certainly be charged." The one glaring exception to that rule is what's happening on the native reserves. The Mohawks in Kahnawake claim that they are sovereign and hence are not subject to Canadian gaming law and consequently host various offshore gambling companies which offer their products on the Mohawk International Technologies servers. But native rights issues are nothing new to North America. The same reason has been used by many native groups in the U.S. for allowing gambling on their reserves and for the most part U.S. authorities leave the reserves alone. To date no one in the government has challenged Kanhawake's sovereign rights although the police have visited the reserve without incidence. Right now several companies including Bovada.lv, Sportingbet.com and Sportsinteraction.com are providing services from the servers in Kahnawake.
That said the laws in Canada are quite clear compared to the United States. The law is covered in Section VII of the Canadian Criminal Code and essentially says the following: It is illegal for someone to take wagers, supply gambling information or run pools or lotteries with the following exceptions:
- Pari-mutuel horse racing
- Lotteries owned by the provincial governments or run by charities
- Private wagers placed between 2 individuals who are not involved in the betting industry. (The amount is irrelevant. So if two friends bet $100,000 on a football game, the bet is legal).
- Betting information provided for media outlets
- Sports pools that do not have a fee attached to them
- Sports betting on multiple outcomes in a "lottery scheme"
- Casinos owned or commissioned by the provincial governments
It should be noted that all laws on the Canadian books relate only to those in the gambling industry. There is no law that can charge the bettors themselves, so there is absolutely nothing illegal about a Canadian bettor wagering with an offshore sportsbook.
For the most part police have not tried to arrest anyone in Canada for illegal gambling although in February of 2013 the police raided a super bowl party in Markham, Ontario and arrested 6 individuals associated with the Costa Rican website PlatinumSB.com. Following the arrests the RCMP seized the PlatinumSB.com website and put up a notice "restrained by a court order" although PlatinumSB restarted under a different domain out of reach to the RCMP shortly after. The police called PlatinumSB's owners a part of organized crime and were clear that the general public were not invited to the Super Bowl party.
"I want to be clear that this event last night was not open to the public," Supt. Paul Pedersen told reporters at a news conference after the raid. "Only those invited by the organizers of this criminal enterprise could attend."
No doubt that raid caused some concern for some offshore operators although the vast majority of them understand it would be ignorant to host a party on Canadian soil and take bets in Canada, in clear violation of Canadian law.
Lipton suggested that to date Canada has not had the desire or resources to try and actually target offshore operators but said that there may be a bit more interest now that all provinces are set to offer online gambling and don't want competition from offshore operators. Currently BC, Manitoba and Quebec offer online gambling including poker, casino games and multi game sports betting and Ontario is set to offer online gambling at any time. Moreover a law has already passed parliament (but was temporarily nixed by the Senate) that will allow single game sports betting and BC made a preemptive move by hiring Paddy Power to run the single game sports betting if and when the law changes. Should the government decide to target offshore operators, Lipton suggested that they would likely go after the "low hanging fruit," meaning any owners or management that lives in Canada or any easily obtained assets on Canadian soil.
Some politicians have even been so bold as to suggest that offshore operators are the reasons for poor sales of legal gambling products in Canada. Brent Scrimshaw, the President and CEO of the Atlantic Lottery Corporation blamed Bet365 for poor sales of the proline sports lottery in Atlantic Canada and demanded that they stop advertising their products in Canada. He also indicated he would prefer to see them shut down.
"Unlike Atlantic Lottery, these offshore, unregulated and illegal sites do not operate with responsible gaming as part of their DNA," Scrimshaw said to the media, "they do not have a stake in the well-being of Atlantic Canadians." Of course Scrimshaw failed to indicate that if those in Atlantic Canada could bet single game sports and/or if the hold wasn't 40% or more that far more sports bettors would play with the lottery.Others I spoke to, however, said that in their opinion Canada is not interested in offshore operations and there is no movement or desire to target offshore operators because they don't want to deal with possible violation of trade agreements.
"The government in Canada respects international trade agreements and hence they haven't targeted online gambling operators. They understand that the internet is truly international and Canada has been screwed many times by other countries and particularly the U.S. who have refused to abide by negotiated treaties," one analyst who asked not to be named told me. He also pointed to the infamous WTO case where the United States failed to abide by a decision made by the WTO that required them to offer gambling services from the island of Antigua and said that Canada was one of the countries that asked for trade concessions from the U.S. for being wronged.
"How hypocritical would it be for Canada to demand compensation from the United States because it failed to live up to a trade agreement over gambling and then try and block other sovereign countries from doing the same thing from their own lands?"
Yet others are suggesting that the issue has nothing whatsoever to do with Canada and the moves are a result by pressure from the United States. At the GIGSE conference in San Francisco a common theme throughout the conference was the suggestion that the United States had to do something about offshore gambling because it was hurting igaming in the United States. Several speakers suggested that offshore websites were the reason that revenues for the various legal poker sites in New Jersey were doing so poorly. The New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement threat was enough to convince Bovada and Merge to geo-target players in New Jersey and block them from playing at their poker sites. Some analysts believe that the DoJ is targeting Canada since so many Americans are still playing offshore despite numerous impediments put on them to funding accounts and in the DoJ's estimation the only way they can possibly be doing this is with Canadian addresses.
Then again some are truly suggesting that Matchbook's reason for withdrawing is purely a strategic one. I spoke with someone who has a vast knowledge of all offshore operations and he said that Matchbook's growing customer base is in Europe and Asia. The company was bought from WSEX by UK owners a few years back and it wasn't long after that they withdrew their services from the U.S. market.
"Canada is virtually nothing to Matchbook so it makes more sense for them to focus all their efforts in the Eastern Hemisphere. They probably looked at their customer base, looked at some of the chatter in Canada and decided they just didn't need the hassle. Also who knows? Maybe they are planning on expanding to a country in Asia, Australia or Europe who demanded they withdraw from all grey markets before getting a license."
We'll likely never know the exact reason why Matchbook withdrew from Canada but the news has caused many tongues to start wagging. One thing is certain. Right now Canadians still have many options for offshore gambling and for funding offshore accounts and that won't change without a fight from the millions of Canadian bettors and lobby groups like the Canadian Gaming Association.
pages: << 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 80 >>
  • 1669

  • 1816
  • 1537

  • 1543

  • 1549

  • 1546

  • Getting Started Poker in 4 steps

    Step 1 Step 2
    Step 3 Step 4